News Center
[Zhongji Public Welfare] Our firm is carrying out a volunteer service activity to commemorate the “March 5th Lei Feng Memorial Day.”
To promote the spirit of Lei Feng and put into practice the core socialist values, our firm will carry out a “Learn from Lei Feng” activity on March 5—the “Lei Feng Memorial Day.”

The Party Branch of our firm actively responded to the call and launched a “Learn from Lei Feng Legal Consultation Volunteer Service” activity in Heilinpu Subdistrict, Wuhua District. Centered on providing free legal consultation services, this initiative aims to bring legal knowledge directly to the people and address their practical legal needs.


At the event site, our firm’s lawyers warmly welcomed every member of the public who came for consultation. They listened patiently and attentively to each person’s questions, drawing on their professional legal knowledge and practical experience to provide clear and easy-to-understand explanations. For each individual seeking advice, they offered professional and practical legal recommendations. For some particularly complex legal issues, they even left their contact information to provide follow-up services later on, ensuring that the public’s concerns would be properly addressed.

Meanwhile, Lei Zhixin, Secretary of the Party Branch and a lawyer, went to the Affiliated Middle School of Yunnan Normal University to conduct legal education activities for the school’s teachers and students.
Yang Chunyan, a member of the organizing committee of the Second Party Branch and a lawyer, visited Kunming No. 5 Middle School to deliver a series of lectures titled “Building a Joint Defense Between Home and School to Prevent Campus Bullying,” providing legal safeguards for the healthy growth of adolescents.

Through various forms of action, Zhongji Ren demonstrates its sense of social responsibility and mission, ensuring that the spirit of Lei Feng continues to shine brightly in legal services of the new era. Our firm will remain committed to upholding the spirit of Lei Feng, providing the public with even higher-quality legal services and contributing to the building of a society governed by the rule of law.
On July 18, 2025, a delegation led by Li Yousheng, Member of the Party Committee and Director of the Political Department of the Chongqing Municipal Justice Bureau, and Secretary of the Party Committee of the Chongqing Lawyers’ Industry, together with He Hongtao, President of the Chongqing Lawyers Association; Xu Deng, Deputy Director of the Lawyers’ Work Division of the Chongqing Municipal Justice Bureau and Secretary-General of the Municipal Lawyers Association; Chen Youkun, Executive Vice President of the Chongqing Lawyers Association; Jiang Zhiguang, Deputy Secretary-General of the Chongqing Lawyers Association; Luo Shu, Director of the Chongqing Lawyers Association’s Specialized Committee on Cross-border Dispute Resolution; Jiang Qin, Director of Chongqing Zhihe Zhi Law Firm; Du Xiaohua, Director of Chongqing Huadong Law Firm; and Luo Canlin, Partner at Chongqing Qihui Law Firm, paid a visit to our firm, accompanied by Wan Li, Vice President of the All China Lawyers Association, President of the Yunnan Lawyers Association, and Director of our firm, as well as Zhang Hui, Vice President of the Yunnan Lawyers Association. The delegation came to our firm to engage in business exchange activities.
On July 11, 2025, Attorney Chen Jinling, Director of the Environmental and Energy Practice Committee of our firm, was invited to deliver a special lecture for the rotating training program for Party members in Kunyuan Road Community, Zhaozong Community, and Mianshan Community. Over a hundred Party members and community staff who attended the event joined Attorney Chen Jinling in interpreting the "Regulations on Disciplinary Actions of the Communist Party of China," thereby contributing to the strengthening of Party conduct within the communities.
Recently, the judicial opinion in Civil Judgment No. (2018) Supreme People's Court Min Shen No. 5332—that “even if the construction contract is invalid, since the parties have explicitly agreed on a reduction ratio for the settlement of project payments, which reflects their true intentions, and the project has passed acceptance inspection, the agreement on the reduction ratio is binding on both parties”—has been widely circulated within the circle of construction lawyers, bringing joy to Party A (the general contractor or sub-contractor, or the party engaging in illegal subcontracting) and causing distress to Party B (the actual constructor). On this issue, the author holds a different view, arguing that the aforementioned opinion and judicial rule represent only a partial glimpse, failing to capture the whole picture. They do not reflect “the evolution and refinement of judicial practice regarding the aforementioned issue,” nor do they reveal “the growing convergence of judicial rules toward the ‘actual participation in management costs’ theory, which is more equitable and just.”