News Center
[Zhongji Public Welfare] Our firm is carrying out a volunteer service activity to commemorate the “March 5th Lei Feng Memorial Day.”
To promote the spirit of Lei Feng and put into practice the core socialist values, our firm will carry out a “Learn from Lei Feng” activity on March 5—the “Lei Feng Memorial Day.”

The Party Branch of our firm actively responded to the call and launched a “Learn from Lei Feng Legal Consultation Volunteer Service” activity in Heilinpu Subdistrict, Wuhua District. Centered on providing free legal consultation services, this initiative aims to bring legal knowledge directly to the people and address their practical legal needs.


At the event site, our firm’s lawyers warmly welcomed every member of the public who came for consultation. They listened patiently and attentively to each person’s questions, drawing on their professional legal knowledge and practical experience to provide clear and easy-to-understand explanations. For each individual seeking advice, they offered professional and practical legal recommendations. For some particularly complex legal issues, they even left their contact information to provide follow-up services later on, ensuring that the public’s concerns would be properly addressed.

Meanwhile, Lei Zhixin, Secretary of the Party Branch and a lawyer, went to the Affiliated Middle School of Yunnan Normal University to conduct legal education activities for the school’s teachers and students.
Yang Chunyan, a member of the organizing committee of the Second Party Branch and a lawyer, visited Kunming No. 5 Middle School to deliver a series of lectures titled “Building a Joint Defense Between Home and School to Prevent Campus Bullying,” providing legal safeguards for the healthy growth of adolescents.

Through various forms of action, Zhongji Ren demonstrates its sense of social responsibility and mission, ensuring that the spirit of Lei Feng continues to shine brightly in legal services of the new era. Our firm will remain committed to upholding the spirit of Lei Feng, providing the public with even higher-quality legal services and contributing to the building of a society governed by the rule of law.
From August 3 to August 9, 2025, the first offline intensive training session for applicants seeking lawyer’s licenses for 2025, organized by the Kunming Lawyers Association, was successfully held in the International Conference Hall on the fifth floor of the Kunming Taili International Hotel. During the training, Attorney She Haibo was invited to deliver a highly informative and practical special lecture to the trainee lawyers in attendance.
As the fight against corruption continues to deepen, the number of official misconduct cases—primarily involving bribery offenses—remains on a fairly rapid upward trajectory. At the same time, the amounts involved in these official misconduct cases keep shattering previous perceptions. Under the current judicial interpretation, which stipulates that embezzlement and bribery amounts exceeding 3 million yuan will result in a sentence of more than ten years’ imprisonment, whether the defendant can have their legal liability reduced and receive a lighter sentence often hinges on whether they qualify for the self-surrender and meritorious service provisions set forth in Articles 67 and 68 of the Criminal Law—these provisions frequently become the defendant’s last “lifeline.” However, in judicial practice, due to inconsistencies in judicial philosophies and differences in evidence-gathering approaches, the determination of self-surrender circumstances often becomes a contentious and difficult issue throughout the course of case handling. Drawing on common problems encountered in judicial practice, the author examines the current practical challenges in identifying self-surrender circumstances in official misconduct cases, thereby calling for the consolidation of consensus within judicial practice.
[Lawyer’s Perspective] A Comparative Legal Examination of the Miranda Rule
The Miranda Rule, born out of the Miranda case in Arizona, USA, in the 1960s, has had a profound impact on the history of law. In essence, the Miranda Rule brought to public attention—through a sensationalized approach—the suspect’s right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present (the right to legal counsel)—leaving an indelible impression on everyone. Although some countries’ laws had already addressed the rights to silence and to counsel prior to this, it was the Miranda Rule that explicitly required that these rights be clearly and unmistakably informed to the suspect; otherwise, the procedure would be deemed unlawful. In fact, the Miranda Rule is not unfamiliar to the general public. We often see it portrayed in movies and TV shows—particularly in Hong Kong dramas—where officers frequently say during arrests: “You have the right to remain silent, but everything you say may be used against you in court.” That’s precisely the Miranda Rule (also known as the Miranda Warning)—though the full text of the Miranda Rule encompasses much more than just this brief statement.