News Center
Lecture Preview | Attorney Dong Hao: Training in Drafting Commercial Legal Opinions and Developing a Professional Mindset
Whether in litigation or non-litigation contexts, a lawyer’s professional skills and core competencies are embodied in their ability to analyze and resolve issues for clients through their specialized expertise. Among these, the analysis and drafting of legal opinions represent a particularly critical component, directly reflecting a lawyer’s individual level of proficiency. To this end, Attorney Dong Hao from our firm will be delivering a special lecture titled “Training in Drafting Commercial Legal Opinions and Developing Related Thinking Approaches.” This lecture is intended for: junior lawyers, paralegals, in-house corporate counsel, and other interested individuals. We warmly invite everyone to participate actively. I. Lecture Topic: Training in Drafting Commercial Legal Opinions and Developing Related Thinking Approaches
Whether in litigation or non-litigation matters, a lawyer’s professional skills and core competencies are embodied in the ability to analyze and resolve clients’ issues through their own professional expertise. Among these, the analysis and drafting of legal opinions represent a critically important component that directly reflects a lawyer’s individual proficiency. To this end, Attorney Dong Hao from our firm will be delivering a special lecture titled “Training in Drafting Commercial Legal Opinions and Developing Related Thinking Patterns.”
This lecture is intended for: junior lawyers, paralegals, in-house counsel, and other interested individuals. We warmly invite everyone to join us!
I. Lecture Topic: Training in Drafting Commercial Legal Opinions and Developing a Logical Mindset
II. Lecture Time:
9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., April 9, 2020, Beijing Time
Los Angeles Time: April 8, 2020, 6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
III. Speaker: Dong Hao (Attorney at Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm, Chief Strategy Officer of the U.S. Office)
4. Lecture Format: Live Online Broadcast
Within China, please scan the following blue mini-program code using [WeChat] to enter.
Previous:
Next:
![[Lawyer’s Perspective] The Difficult and Controversial Issue of Collusive Bidding Accompanying Official Crimes](/npublic/img/s.png "[Lawyer’s Perspective] The Difficult and Controversial Issue of Collusive Bidding Accompanying Official Crimes")
A new trend has emerged in the field of construction engineering: collusion in bidding, often accompanied by bribery and acceptance of bribes, is becoming increasingly common. In fact, such collusive bidding practices have always existed to some extent; however, previously the focus was mainly on investigating and prosecuting bribery and acceptance of bribes, with little attention paid to the related issue of collusive bidding itself. Faced with this new trend, collusive bidding crimes clearly deserve greater attention. Yet even more important is the complexity and controversy surrounding these cases. The complexity of such collusive bidding stems from the intricate interplay among official misconduct, the crime of collusive bidding, differences between administrative and criminal offenses, and the nuanced relationship—dependent on specific factual circumstances—that determines whether a collusive bid actually constitutes a crime. This situation involves not only questions of fact-finding and legal application but also a number of issues that warrant careful examination from both legal and logical perspectives.
In the field of construction engineering, recoverable profits are directly linked to the economic interest balance and protection of the parties to a contract, often amounting to millions, tens of millions, or even hundreds of millions of yuan. However, due to the unique characteristics and complexity of construction projects, disputes arising from construction contract disputes frequently give rise to numerous controversies among the parties involved. Moreover, the people's courts do not consistently—nor even uniformly—interpret or apply the standards for awarding compensation for lost recoverable profits, with varying approaches sometimes being markedly different. By analyzing relevant legal provisions and typical cases, this article systematically reviews the current state of judicial practice regarding the protection of recoverable profits in construction engineering, identifies existing problems, and proposes potential solutions, thereby providing reference for the compliant party in anticipating and asserting their recoverable profits.
To thoroughly implement the general requirements for Party building in the new era, fully unleash the fighting fortress effectiveness of grassroots Party organizations and the exemplary role of Party members, and promote the deep integration of Party building with business operations—thus driving high-quality development through high-quality Party building—on July 2, 2025, the Party Branch Committee of Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm and the Second Party Branch of China National Shipbuilding Industry Materials Cloud-Guizhou Co., Ltd. jointly hosted a Party building co-construction symposium and signing ceremony, marking the beginning of a new chapter of cooperation.
Our firm is divided into several business departments based on their respective areas of practice, including: Criminal Law Department, Civil Law Department, Administrative Law Department, Financial and Securities Department, Construction and Real Estate Department, Intellectual Property Department, and Labor and Healthcare Department.
Column Menu
Contact Information
China Office Address: No. 730 Renmin West Road, Wuhua District, Kunming City, Zhongji Building (Exit D, Mianshan Metro Station)
Phone:0871-63641358 0871-63640463
U.S. Irvine Address: 930 Roosevelt Suite 215, Irvine, CA, 92620
Contact phone number:(+1) 949-701-8756
Email:zhangqian@zhongjilaw.com
Arcadia, USA Address: 411 E Huntington Dr., Ste 206, Arcadia, CA 91006
Contact phone number:(+1) 626-838-6868
Follow us