Lecture Preview | Attorney Dong Hao: Training in Drafting Commercial Legal Opinions and Developing a Professional Mindset


Whether in litigation or non-litigation contexts, a lawyer’s professional skills and core competencies are embodied in their ability to analyze and resolve issues for clients through their specialized expertise. Among these, the analysis and drafting of legal opinions represent a particularly critical component, directly reflecting a lawyer’s individual level of proficiency. To this end, Attorney Dong Hao from our firm will be delivering a special lecture titled “Training in Drafting Commercial Legal Opinions and Developing Related Thinking Approaches.” This lecture is intended for: junior lawyers, paralegals, in-house corporate counsel, and other interested individuals. We warmly invite everyone to participate actively. I. Lecture Topic: Training in Drafting Commercial Legal Opinions and Developing Related Thinking Approaches


Whether in litigation or non-litigation matters, a lawyer’s professional skills and core competencies are embodied in the ability to analyze and resolve clients’ issues through their own professional expertise. Among these, the analysis and drafting of legal opinions represent a critically important component that directly reflects a lawyer’s individual proficiency. To this end, Attorney Dong Hao from our firm will be delivering a special lecture titled “Training in Drafting Commercial Legal Opinions and Developing Related Thinking Patterns.”

This lecture is intended for: junior lawyers, paralegals, in-house counsel, and other interested individuals. We warmly invite everyone to join us!

I. Lecture Topic: Training in Drafting Commercial Legal Opinions and Developing a Logical Mindset

II. Lecture Time:

9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., April 9, 2020, Beijing Time

Los Angeles Time: April 8, 2020, 6:00 pm - 7:30 pm

III. Speaker: Dong Hao (Attorney at Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm, Chief Strategy Officer of the U.S. Office)

4. Lecture Format: Live Online Broadcast

Within China, please scan the following blue mini-program code using [WeChat] to enter.

Next:

Return to list


[Zhongji News] Attorney Hai Bo from our firm has been invited to give a lecture to the 2025 applicant lawyers of the Kunming Lawyers Association.

From August 3 to August 9, 2025, the first offline intensive training session for applicants seeking lawyer’s licenses for 2025, organized by the Kunming Lawyers Association, was successfully held in the International Conference Hall on the fifth floor of the Kunming Taili International Hotel. During the training, Attorney She Haibo was invited to deliver a highly informative and practical special lecture to the trainee lawyers in attendance.



[Lawyer’s Perspective] Practical Dilemmas in the Determination of Self-Surrender as an Aggravating Factor in Official Corruption Crimes

As the fight against corruption continues to deepen, the number of official misconduct cases—primarily involving bribery offenses—remains on a fairly rapid upward trajectory. At the same time, the amounts involved in these official misconduct cases keep shattering previous perceptions. Under the current judicial interpretation, which stipulates that embezzlement and bribery amounts exceeding 3 million yuan will result in a sentence of more than ten years’ imprisonment, whether the defendant can have their legal liability reduced and receive a lighter sentence often hinges on whether they qualify for the self-surrender and meritorious service provisions set forth in Articles 67 and 68 of the Criminal Law—these provisions frequently become the defendant’s last “lifeline.” However, in judicial practice, due to inconsistencies in judicial philosophies and differences in evidence-gathering approaches, the determination of self-surrender circumstances often becomes a contentious and difficult issue throughout the course of case handling. Drawing on common problems encountered in judicial practice, the author examines the current practical challenges in identifying self-surrender circumstances in official misconduct cases, thereby calling for the consolidation of consensus within judicial practice.



[Lawyer’s Perspective] A Comparative Legal Examination of the Miranda Rule

The Miranda Rule, born out of the Miranda case in Arizona, USA, in the 1960s, has had a profound impact on the history of law. In essence, the Miranda Rule brought to public attention—through a sensationalized approach—the suspect’s right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present (the right to legal counsel)—leaving an indelible impression on everyone. Although some countries’ laws had already addressed the rights to silence and to counsel prior to this, it was the Miranda Rule that explicitly required that these rights be clearly and unmistakably informed to the suspect; otherwise, the procedure would be deemed unlawful. In fact, the Miranda Rule is not unfamiliar to the general public. We often see it portrayed in movies and TV shows—particularly in Hong Kong dramas—where officers frequently say during arrests: “You have the right to remain silent, but everything you say may be used against you in court.” That’s precisely the Miranda Rule (also known as the Miranda Warning)—though the full text of the Miranda Rule encompasses much more than just this brief statement.

< 1...121314...58 >