News Center
Leadership Care: Zhou Yuansheng, Director of the Bureau of Lawyers’ Work at the Ministry of Justice, and his delegation visited Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm to conduct research and provide guidance.
On the afternoon of January 12, 2021, Zhou Yuansheng, Director of the Lawyers’ Work Bureau of the Ministry of Justice; Yan Guo, Deputy Secretary-General of the All China Lawyers Association; Liu Chunhua, Director of the Division for Foreign-Related and Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan Affairs of the Lawyers’ Work Bureau of the Ministry of Justice; and Li Kai'ang, First-Level Chief Staff Member of the Lawyers’ Work Bureau of the Ministry of Justice, visited Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm (formerly Yunnan Liu Hule Law Firm) to provide guidance and conduct a research study on the Party building work among lawyers. Zhao Zuping, Member of the Party Committee and Deputy Director of the Yunnan Provincial Department of Justice, as well as Party Secretary of the provincial lawyers’ industry; Wan Li, President of the Yunnan Provincial Lawyers Association; and Li Jiangan, Director of the Lawyers’ Work Management Division of the Yunnan Provincial Department of Justice and Secretary-General of the Yunnan Provincial Lawyers Association, accompanied the research team. The research focused primarily on the current status of Party building in the legal profession, the practice environment for lawyers, and the development of the legal profession. Accompanied by Wan Li, Director of Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm, and its staff, the research team toured the new office building of Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm.
On the afternoon of January 12, 2021, Zhou Yuansheng, Director of the Lawyers’ Work Bureau of the Ministry of Justice; Yan Guo, Deputy Secretary-General of the All China Lawyers Association; Liu Chunhua, Director of the Foreign-Related and Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan Affairs Management Division of the Lawyers’ Work Bureau of the Ministry of Justice; and Li Kai'ang, First-Level Chief Staff Member of the Lawyers’ Work Bureau of the Ministry of Justice, visited Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm (formerly Yunnan Liu Hule Law Firm) to provide guidance and conduct a research visit on the Party building work among lawyers. Zhao Zuping, member of the Party Committee and Deputy Director of the Yunnan Provincial Department of Justice, as well as Party Secretary of the provincial lawyers’ industry; Wan Li, President of the Yunnan Provincial Lawyers Association; and Li Jiangan, Director of the Lawyers’ Work Management Division of the Yunnan Provincial Department of Justice and Secretary-General of the Yunnan Provincial Lawyers Association, accompanied the visit. The primary focus of this research was the current status of Party building in the legal profession, the practice environment for lawyers, and the development trends of the legal profession.
Accompanied by Wan Li, Director of Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm, and its staff, the research team visited the new office building of Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm.
Subsequently, the research team visited the Party-building activity hall and the United Front Members’ Home of Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm. Director Wan Li and the staff briefed the working group on the establishment process of the Party committee of Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm, its composition, the implementation of Party building among lawyers, and the achievements made in lawyer Party building. After carefully listening to the briefing, the research team engaged in an in-depth exchange with the staff on specific models mentioned in the report—such as the vertical management of Party committees and using Party building to promote institutional development—as well as on how Party organizations play a role in law firm management.
This research activity represents the recognition and affirmation of the Party organization and senior leaders toward the Party-building work at Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm. Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm would like to express its heartfelt gratitude to the research team for the valuable insights and suggestions they provided regarding the Party-building efforts of our lawyers during this research activity.
In the course of our future work, Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm will further refine its organizational and management system for Party building, tailored to the unique characteristics of the legal profession. We will continuously explore and innovate in both the forms and content of Party-building activities, thereby strengthening the leading and safeguarding role of Party organizations in the development of the legal profession. The Party organization of Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm will better leverage its role in driving Party building within the industry, fully harness the exemplary and pioneering role of Party members, unite the strength of all lawyers, better serve the legal needs of the public, and make greater contributions to the construction of a socialist rule-of-law society.
Next:
From August 3 to August 9, 2025, the first offline intensive training session for applicants seeking lawyer’s licenses for 2025, organized by the Kunming Lawyers Association, was successfully held in the International Conference Hall on the fifth floor of the Kunming Taili International Hotel. During the training, Attorney She Haibo was invited to deliver a highly informative and practical special lecture to the trainee lawyers in attendance.
As the fight against corruption continues to deepen, the number of official misconduct cases—primarily involving bribery offenses—remains on a fairly rapid upward trajectory. At the same time, the amounts involved in these official misconduct cases keep shattering previous perceptions. Under the current judicial interpretation, which stipulates that embezzlement and bribery amounts exceeding 3 million yuan will result in a sentence of more than ten years’ imprisonment, whether the defendant can have their legal liability reduced and receive a lighter sentence often hinges on whether they qualify for the self-surrender and meritorious service provisions set forth in Articles 67 and 68 of the Criminal Law—these provisions frequently become the defendant’s last “lifeline.” However, in judicial practice, due to inconsistencies in judicial philosophies and differences in evidence-gathering approaches, the determination of self-surrender circumstances often becomes a contentious and difficult issue throughout the course of case handling. Drawing on common problems encountered in judicial practice, the author examines the current practical challenges in identifying self-surrender circumstances in official misconduct cases, thereby calling for the consolidation of consensus within judicial practice.
[Lawyer’s Perspective] A Comparative Legal Examination of the Miranda Rule
The Miranda Rule, born out of the Miranda case in Arizona, USA, in the 1960s, has had a profound impact on the history of law. In essence, the Miranda Rule brought to public attention—through a sensationalized approach—the suspect’s right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present (the right to legal counsel)—leaving an indelible impression on everyone. Although some countries’ laws had already addressed the rights to silence and to counsel prior to this, it was the Miranda Rule that explicitly required that these rights be clearly and unmistakably informed to the suspect; otherwise, the procedure would be deemed unlawful. In fact, the Miranda Rule is not unfamiliar to the general public. We often see it portrayed in movies and TV shows—particularly in Hong Kong dramas—where officers frequently say during arrests: “You have the right to remain silent, but everything you say may be used against you in court.” That’s precisely the Miranda Rule (also known as the Miranda Warning)—though the full text of the Miranda Rule encompasses much more than just this brief statement.