Bringing the Law to the Military: Li Rui Conducted Training for Personnel Involved in Procurement Operations at the 96602 Unit of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (a Rocket Force Unit)


At the invitation of the Yunnan Province Bidding and Tendering Association, attorney Li Rui delivered a training session on December 23, 2020, to personnel involved in procurement operations at Unit 96602 of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (a Rocket Force unit). Attorney Li Rui provided training covering various aspects, including government procurement procedures and methods, regulatory requirements, and case studies.


At the invitation of the Yunnan Province Bidding and Tendering Association, lawyer Li Rui from Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm delivered a training session on December 23, 2020, to personnel involved in procurement operations at the 96602 Unit of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (a Rocket Force unit). Lawyer Li Rui provided training covering various aspects, including government procurement procedures and methods, regulatory requirements, and case studies.

Although military procurement differs from local procurement and is not subject to the current relevant laws, regulations, and local government policies, the "Government Procurement Law of the People's Republic of China," its implementing regulations, and the numerous related laws and policies together constitute a comprehensive system and framework for procurement. Military procurement can therefore draw on and refer to these established norms and practices.

Through this training, participants have gained a more intuitive and profound understanding of the knowledge related to government procurement practices, further familiarized themselves with government procurement policies and requirements, enhanced their awareness as procurement entities, and reinforced their sense of responsibility in procurement activities. This has significantly improved procurement personnel’s awareness of lawful procurement and their professional competence. The training will play a positive role in standardizing procurement work and lay a solid foundation for performing future procurement tasks effectively.

Introduction to Attorney Li Rui:

Senior Partner at Yunnan Zhongji Law Firm, Head of the Administrative Affairs Department, and Lead Attorney. Graduate of China University of Political Science and Law. Expert in the PPP Expert Database of the Yunnan Provincial Department of Finance. Specializes in legal practice in administrative areas such as the Government Procurement Law and Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), as well as civil and commercial disputes including private lending disputes and corporate bankruptcy and restructuring.

As one of the first batch of legal experts in the Yunnan Provincial Department of Finance’s PPP Project Expert Database, I have participated in the review of more than 40 PPP projects. During these reviews, I provided project companies with advice and insights on various aspects, including contract management, risk management, regulatory frameworks, policy support systems, and investment and financing models for PPP projects. As a result, I have accumulated a wealth of materials and case studies in the PPP field and possess considerable theoretical and practical experience.

Return to list


[Branch News] The Communist Youth League Branch and the Women’s Federation of Zhongji Dali Branch Have Been Established.

On September 16, 2025, the founding general meeting of the Communist Youth League branch and the Women's Federation of Yunnan Zhongji (Dali) Law Firm was held with great solemnity. This meeting marks an important step forward for the firm in strengthening Party building to lead Youth League development and in promoting the protection of women’s rights and interests.



[Lawyer’s Perspective] How exactly should illegally obtained evidence in cases of official misconduct be excluded?

Some time ago, a trial was held involving multiple defendants accused of organized crime and evil forces. One of the defendants was also charged with official misconduct. The defendant’s defense counsel argued that the defendant’s statements had been obtained through violent threats and thus requested that the court obtain the simultaneous audio-video recordings to exclude any illegally obtained evidence. Eventually, the court agreed and instructed the supervisory authority to provide the recordings. However, the court stipulated that only the judges and prosecutors could review these recordings—not the defense counsel. Naturally, the defense counsel strongly insisted on being allowed to view the recordings, even becoming quite confrontational at times. Yet the court remained firm in its refusal, citing it as judicial practice. In the end, the defense counsel never got to see the recordings. In fact, this incident highlights a fundamental issue: neither side could find any legal basis for whether the defense counsel should be permitted to review the simultaneous recordings. The defense counsel couldn’t point to any legal provision authorizing such access, while the court itself couldn’t produce any clear legal rationale for either permitting or denying the defense counsel’s request—leaving them with nothing but the claim that it was simply “judicial practice.”



[Zhongji News] Attorney Li Wenhua from our firm has been invited to deliver a lecture for Yunnan Power Grid Co., Ltd.

[Zhongji News] Attorney Li Wenhua from our firm has been invited to deliver a lecture for Yunnan Power Grid Co., Ltd.

< 1...456...58 >